Thursday, November 9, 2017

Advice Column Gets It Wrong

Here's an advice column question and answer, if you're into that sort of thing.

Childless Couple Vows to End Friendship over Kids


There's so much to unpack here.

First of all, NO. There is no comparison between losing parents that lived full lives (and with whom you have memories) and losing children with whom you didn't get to share life. I've already explained that here.

I can agree that "a mature adult learns to process sadness and tolerate discomfort, and not punish others for it." BUT... Processing not only sadness, but devastation and traumatic loss, is a pretty big deal. It takes time. I don't think it's wrong to give some people a couple of years to do this. I mean, that's a pretty tall order, am I right? Plus, people that are in the situation like this/mine (living life without children after surviving infertility) are not punishing others; we are simply taking care of ourselves in a world that, not only does not take care of us, but that also absolutely does not understand, nor have any iota of compassion, understanding, or space for us.

We are just living our lives like anyone else, thank you very much.


So I drafted a response letter in my mind.


Dear "Friends Until Kids,"

I'm sorry your friends are draining you. What you may not understand is that they've been through this before. Things change after you have kids. And that's okay. Understandable even. You're right that choosing not to adopt or not go through IVF is their choice. It's one that spares them any further trauma.

I'm here to say: your friendship with them may indeed be limited. They have probably been down this road before. They know how it goes and they are just giving you a heads up, even if the warning is early in its time. You'll learn soon enough--that your time will be made up of (insert your child's name here). Your friends? They already know.

It's complicated. Your friends can volunteer; they can be mentors or teachers; they can be an awesome aunt and uncle. But there are appropriate and necessary boundaries for those roles. There is no substitute for that parent-child bond.

It's okay. That's just how it is. But for people who wanted what you're getting, well, they're just probably giving you space at this time. Space to enjoy what you have. For you to enjoy your life. While they enjoy theirs. So, it's nothing negative. Not from you, not from them. They just know how it goes. With Love~

Sincerely,
One Who Knows

8 comments:

  1. The comparison with not having parents is ridiculous. So adult people are as consumed with their parents as people are with their children? Their adult lives revolve around their parents and their schedules etc, in the same way as with parents-young children? Ha, hilarious. Very wrong-footed. A minority of adults have elderly parents who are dependent on them for round-the-clock care (like children!) but I personally, at 45!, don't have any friends in that position. I do, however, have plenty of friends who are entirely consumed by the kids and can't see me very often. I'll read your post that you link to about this now; it's really annoyed me that they answered with such a nonsensical analogy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shores! I always love hearing from you. :)

      You're exactly right. Caring for aging parents does not usually require the time and all-consuming attention that caring for a newborn does.

      Delete
  2. Yep, *that*'s an appropriate response.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks. I may have been preaching to the choir, but at least someone heard me and listened. Thank you. <3

      Delete
  3. Excellent response! You should send it to Ask Amy, because clearly she needs help on this topic. LOTS of help!

    I had a lot to say, but I think you might be inspiring me to blog about this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hahaha I honestly hadn't thought of sending my response to the columnist. I might do that... And if you blog about this, I will really enjoy reading it!

      Delete
  4. Awesome response on your part. Not going to lie, bristled hard at the whole "they could easily find fulfilling ways to have children in their lives" -- like you said, sure you can do things with other people's kids, but it doesn't take that pain and loss away. That was one thing the therapist I quit kept saying, was "how are you going to get children in your lives" as if by having some sort of surrogate child relationship it would ease our own loss. I'm all for kids in my life, and I enjoy my friends' kids, but I do not enjoy child interactions where one is foisted upon me, or there's a group of people with kids and we're the only sad childless ones. There doesn't seem to be any empathy for the couple, who are just trying to be honest that their friendship will change once they have kids. As you said, because they've probably been through this before. Argh. I agree with Mali, write it in!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you. The whole response irritated me. I have worked or volunteered with kids my whole life and have loved it, but I never felt like I was a parent to any of them.

      And I *hate* how the letter writer says the couple "chose" not to adopt. Like it's a choice. I've started telling people when they ask me about adoption that it's not a guaranteed process. People are usually surprised to hear that.

      And I hate being with a group of people with kids and being the only one that isn't a parent. It's uncomfortable for several reasons. Maybe that's another post sometime...

      Delete